Newsletter Articles
Dave Olson's top 10 reasons to plant churches
Roger Ganzel, with gratitude to Tom Harper
Have you read Dave Olson's The American Church in Crisis? I credit Tom Harper in his blog for asking that question of me. He quoted everything from Dave Olson’s book that I am here. I don’t want sharing this to distract you from reading the book; please do, because in it he shares so many statistics and strategies that play directly into concerns we share at TransformingChurch.com. As a five-time church developer myself, I personally cannot do enough to highlight the reasons Olson gives for church planting.
At TC.com we have been intent on sounding the alarm how in this new age all of our churches organized on the basis of membership are heading toward the death of their institution. It is becoming increasingly evident that we need to take membership apart and re-emerge as disciples. It is rare that a member can make the transition to being a disciple.
So here are some startling statistics from Dave Olson’s book:
"Every group with less than a 1% planting rate—less than one new church for every 100 established churches—is declining numerically in attendance. For a denomination to keep up with population growth, it needs a planting rate of more than 2% each year—or 1 new church started for every 50 established churches. Many evangelical groups plant three or four new churches a year for every 100 established churches, which is why their attendance growth exceeds population growth.
"Unfortunately, the 3,700 churches that close per year reduce the impact of the 4,000 new churches that start, leaving a net yearly gain of 300 churches in the United States. A net gain of 3,205 churches is needed each year for the American church to keep up with population growth; this is far less than the actual yearly gain of 300 churches. This means that an additional 2,900 new churches need to be started each year in the United States to match population growth. Since the closure rate is quite consistent year after year, the only solution to this challenge is to plant more churches."
Following are the reasons to plant a church, according to Olson:
1. New churches lower the age profile of the American church, increase its multiethnicity, and better position the whole church for future changes.
2. New churches provide synergistic benefits to established churches. Research show that denominations that plant many strong churches have more healthy, growing, established churches than those who plant few churches.
3. The continued growth of new churches will extend up to 40 years after their start. The growth that occurs in years 10 to 40 is critical for creating a strong base of churches for the future.
4. New churches provide a channel to express the energy and ideas of passionate, innovative young pastors. Church planting encourages the development of the expansionist gifts of ministry and leadership. Denominations that plant few churches unintentionally focus on training pastors in stabilizing gifts. A denomination needs both stabilizing and expansionist gifts to be both healthy and growing.
5. New churches are the research and development unit of God’s kingdom. New churches create most of the current models and visions for healthy life. Healthy cultural adaptations and theological vitality occur more often in a denomination that excels at church planting, because the ferment of new ideas and ministry solutions is more robust.
6. New churches are the test laboratory for lay leadership development. Because top lay leadership positions are usually already filled in the parent church, new churches provide a new group of emerging lay leaders the opportunity to grow and develop as primary leaders. In new church plants that do well, most lay members report that being part of the beginning of the new church was one of the defining spiritual events in their life.
7. New churches are historically the best method for reaching each emerging new generation. While many established churches have the ability to connect with the younger cohort, each generation also seems to need their own new type of churches that speak the gospel with their own cultural values and communications style.
8. New churches are the only truly effective means to reach the growing ethnic populations coming to America. Every people group needs to hear the gospel in a way that makes sense to their culture. It is difficult for established churches to become diverse. Church planting can effectively create both ethnic-specific and multiethnic congregations.
9. New churches are more effective than established churches at conversion growth. Studies show that new churches have three to four times the conversion rate per attendee than established churches.
10. Because the large majority of Americans do not attend a local church, many more new churches are needed. In 2005, 17.5% of Americans attended a local church on any given Sunday. Seventy-seven percent of Americans do not have a consistent connection with an orthodox Christian church. To keep up with population growth is to start new churches.”
From The American Church in Crisis: Groundbreaking Research Based on a National Database of over 200,000 Churches, by David T. Olson (Zondervan, 2008). I would also like to leave you with another link to Tom Harper who brought this to my attention.
More like this one in | Newsletter Articles
Comments on this Entry:
Post a comment